<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>James Mansson’s Chess Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sports-data.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk</link>
	<description>Chess games, reports, reviews and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:41:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Horsham Club Championship 2011-12: Mansson &#8211; Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/horsham-club-championship-2011-12-mansson-heath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/horsham-club-championship-2011-12-mansson-heath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Modern Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was back to winning ways on Tuesday with a decisive win over Chris Heath in the club championship. Following a dubious opening, I took control of the position, and my opponent was unable to find a way to wriggle &#8230; <a href="http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/horsham-club-championship-2011-12-mansson-heath/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was back to winning ways on Tuesday with a decisive win over Chris Heath in the club championship. Following a dubious opening, I took control of the position, and my opponent was unable to find a way to wriggle out.<span id="more-1001"></span></p>
<p>I give the game below with some brief notes.</p>
<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_daa331e' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event "Club Championship"]  [Site "Horsham"]  [Date "2012.2.14"]  [White "Mansson, James C"]  [Black "Heath, Chris W"]  [Result "1-0"]  [Eco "B06"]  [Annotator "Mansson, James C"]   1.Nf3 g6 2.e4 Bg7 3.d4 d6 4.c4 f5   {?! 4&#8230;Nf6 5.Nc3 transposes to the King&#8217;s Indian.}   5.Nc3 Nc6 6.exf5 Bxf5 7.Be3 Nf6 8.d5   {White is now able to drive back the Black pieces into a passive position.}   Nb8 9.Nd4 Bd7 10.Qb3 Qc8 11.Be2 Na6 12.h4   {! This aims to push back Black further, and also to discourage kingside castling.}   Nc5 13.Qc2 Bf5 14.Qd1 e5   {?! This looks like a dubious idea, as it expose the Black position.}   15.dxe6 Bxe6 16.h5 Qd7 17.h6 Bf8 18.Nxe6   {18.b4! was more incisive, e.g. 18&#8230;Nce4 19.Nxe4 Nxe4 20.Nxe6 Qxe6 21.Bf3 Qxc4? 22.Qd4!}   Nxe6 19.Nd5 Be7 20.Bg4 Nxg4 21.Qxg4 O-O-O   {? 21&#8230;Bd8 followed by &#8230;0-0 was better, when Black was still in the game.}   22.Bxa7   {White wins a pawn and gains a strong attack.}   Rhe8   {?! This leads to the Black pieces becoming uncomfortably bunched. 22&#8230;Rhf8 is better.}   23.O-O Nc5 24.Qg3 Ne4 25.Qa3 Qc6 26.b4   {This is good, but even better was 26.Rfe1! which exploits the position of the Black pieces on the e-file.}   Bf8   {26&#8230;Qxc4 27.Nb6+! cxb6 28.Rac1 wins the queen; 26&#8230;Qa6 was a better try, but 27.Qh3+ Rd7 28.Qe6 Ng5 29.Qe3 leaves Black all tied up; 26&#8230;b5 27.Qd3 Nf6 28.Rac1 gives a strong attack.}   27.b5 Qd7   {27&#8230;Qxc4 28.Qh3+ Rd7 29.Nb6+! cxb6 30.Rac1 wins the queen.}   28.Bb6 {!} Qf5   {28&#8230;cxb6 29.Qa8#}   29.Bxc7   {Black resigned, as he loses on the spot if he avoids the loss of the exchange: 29&#8230;Rd7 30.Qa8#.}   1-0   </textarea><iframe src='http://www.sports-data.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/embed-chessboard/pgn4web/board.html?am=none&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=F6F6F6&amp;dch=E0E0E0&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=80p&amp;fmch=000000&amp;fcch=808080&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=80p&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=643&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_daa331e' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='643' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts</iframe></div>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/horsham-club-championship-2011-12-mansson-heath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4NCL Division 3 2011-12: e2e4.org.uk 2 – KJCA Kings</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/4ncl-division-3-2011-12-e2e4-org-uk-2-kjca-kings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/4ncl-division-3-2011-12-e2e4-org-uk-2-kjca-kings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4NCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sicilian Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our match against KJCA Kings in round six was a disaster. Only Samuel Milson secured a draw in a 5.5-0.5 drubbing. My game saw me miscalculating against Andrew Green and going down in flames. I give my game below with &#8230; <a href="http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/4ncl-division-3-2011-12-e2e4-org-uk-2-kjca-kings/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our match against KJCA Kings in round six was a disaster. Only Samuel Milson secured a draw in a 5.5-0.5 drubbing. My game saw me miscalculating against Andrew Green and going down in flames.<span id="more-997"></span></p>
<p>I give my game below with some brief notes.</p>
<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_3891eb14' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event "4NCL"]  [Site "Latimer Place"]  [Date "2012.2.12"]  [Round "6"]  [White "Mansson, James C (e2e4.org.uk 2)"]  [Black "Green, Andrew D (KJCA Kings)"]  [Result "0-1"]  [Eco "B36"]   1.Nf3 c5 2.c4 g6 3.e4 Nc6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 Nf6 6.Nc3 d6 7.Be2 Nxd4  8.Qxd4 Bg7 9.Bg5 O-O 10.Qd2 Be6 11.Rc1 a5   {!?} {An unusual approach by Black.}   12.f3 a4 13.O-O Qa5 14.Kh1 Rfc8 15.b3 axb3 16.axb3 Qb4 17.Rb1   {17.Bd1 was more solid.}   Ra3 18.Rfd1 Rxb3 19.Rxb3 Qxb3 20.Rb1 Qa3 21.Rxb7   {21.Nd5 Bxd5 22.exd5 Rc7 23.Bf1 was better, when the weakness of e7 and the bishop pair give White compensation.}   Bxc4   {I hadn&#8217;t though that this was possible, because of the weakness of Black&#8217;s back  rank. However, I had overlooked a defence for Black.}   22.Bxc4 Rxc4 23.Nb1   {23.Rb8+ Bf8 24.Bh6 Nd7 was what I had overlooked.}   Qa6 24.Rb8+ Rc8 25.Rxc8+ Qxc8 26.h3 Qc4 27.Qa5   {? Black is better, but this move just loses at once.}   Qf1+ 28.Kh2 Qxb1 29.Qd8+ Bf8 30.Bh6 Nd7 0-1   </textarea><iframe src='http://www.sports-data.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/embed-chessboard/pgn4web/board.html?am=none&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=F6F6F6&amp;dch=E0E0E0&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=80p&amp;fmch=000000&amp;fcch=808080&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=80p&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=643&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_3891eb14' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='643' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts</iframe></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/4ncl-division-3-2011-12-e2e4-org-uk-2-kjca-kings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4NCL Division 3 2011-12: e2e4.org.uk 2 – Celtic Tigers 1</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/4ncl-division-3-2011-12-e2e4-org-uk-2-celtic-tigers-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/4ncl-division-3-2011-12-e2e4-org-uk-2-celtic-tigers-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4NCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sicilian Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In round 5 of the 4NCL, e2e4.org.uk 2 managed a dramatic turn-around against Celtic Tigers 1. After going 2-0 down with losses on the top two boards, wins on the bottom two saw them draw level. After David Coates had &#8230; <a href="http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/4ncl-division-3-2011-12-e2e4-org-uk-2-celtic-tigers-1/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In round 5 of the 4NCL, e2e4.org.uk 2 managed a dramatic turn-around against Celtic Tigers 1. After going 2-0 down with losses on the top two boards, wins on the bottom two saw them draw level. After David Coates had held Peter Kemp to a draw on board three, it was all down to me on board four to grind down Angus French in an ending, which I duly did. This gaves us a narrow 3.5-2.5 win at the death.<span id="more-994"></span></p>
<p>I give my game below with some notes. It is a good example of the accumulation of advantages. Black doesn&#8217;t do anything dramatic, but manages to prevail in the end.</p>
<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_7286df14' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event "4NCL"]  [Site "Latimer Place"]  [Date "2012.2.11"]  [Round "5"]  [White "French, Angus J (Celtic Tigers 1)"]  [Black "Mansson, James C (e2e4.org.uk 2)"]  [Result "0-1"]  [Eco "B22"]   1.e4 c5 2.c3 Nf6 3.e5 Nd5 4.Nf3 Nc6 5.Bc4 Nb6 6.Bb3 c4 7.Bc2 d5 8.exd6 Qxd6 9.d4   {?! This gives Black easy equality. 9.O-O was better. White has to play against the pawn on c4, if he is to prove any advantage.}   cxd3 10.Qxd3 Qxd3 11.Bxd3 e5 12.O-O f6 13.Be4 Be6 14.b3 O-O-O 15.Bb2 Nd5 16.Nbd2 Nf4 17.Rad1 Nd3 18.Ba1 Bc5 19.Bxd3   {?! White should be reluctant to give up the bishop pair like this. Black now has a small long-term advantage. Note that even worse was 19.Nb1? Nxf2! and Black wins.}   Rxd3 20.Ne4 Rxd1 21.Rxd1 Be7 22.Kf1 Kc7 23.h3 Re8   {Black didn&#8217;t want to exchange rooks at this point, as he had no obvious way to penetrate the queenside.}   24.c4 Rd8   {However, now he does want to exchange rooks, as the previous move opened a way in!}   25.Ke2 Rxd1 26.Kxd1 Nb4 27.Nc3 a6 28.Ne1   {? This allows a tactical blow. 28.Ke2 was better.}   Bc5   {?! Black missed a chance to win a pawn here with 28&#8230;b5! 29.cxb5 Nxa2!}   29.Ke2 Bf5 30.Bb2 Kc6 31.f3 Nc2 32.Ne4 Nxe1 33.Kxe1 Be7 34.Ke2 Be6 35.Kd3 b5 36.cxb5+   {?! This seems too co-operative. 36.Nd2 looks better.}   axb5 37.Ke3 b4   {! This fixes the White queenside pawns, and leaves Black with the only healthy pawn majority.}   38.Kd3 Bc8 39.Nd2 Ba6+ 40.Nc4   {? This walks into a crippling pin. White should move his king back.}   Kd5   {Here the players reached the time control. Black has a strong bind on the position, but needs to find a way to break through. He now aims to play &#8230;f5 and &#8230;e4, to force the White king back and win a pawn.}   41.Ba1 Bc5 42.Bb2 g6 43.Bc1 f5 44.Bd2   {? 44.Bg5! was better. As the game shows, White must avoid allowing his bishop to run out of squares.}   e4+ 45.fxe4+ fxe4+ 46.Ke2 Bxc4+ 47.bxc4+ Kxc4 48.Be1 Bd4   {48&#8230;e3! at once was the correct approach. Black&#8217;s winning idea is to deprive the White bishop of squares, therefore forcing the White king to move away from e2.}   49.Bd2 Bc5 50.g4 e3! 51.Be1   {51.Bxe3 Bxe3 52.Kxe3 Kc3 wins.}   Kd4 52.h4 Bd6 53.h5 g5 54.h6 Ke4   {White resigned, as he must retreat his king, when Black penetrates decisively.}   0-1   </textarea><iframe src='http://www.sports-data.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/embed-chessboard/pgn4web/board.html?am=none&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=F6F6F6&amp;dch=E0E0E0&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=80p&amp;fmch=000000&amp;fcch=808080&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=80p&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=643&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_7286df14' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='643' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts</iframe></div>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/4ncl-division-3-2011-12-e2e4-org-uk-2-celtic-tigers-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update &#8211; Mid-Sussex League Division 1 2011-12: Horsham 1 – Knoll Knights</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/update-mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-knoll-knights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/update-mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-knoll-knights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mid-Sussex League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dix Roberts&#8217; game against Mike Nicholas on board three was agreed drawn, with the result that the match was drawn 2.5-2.5. Horsham now only have an outside chance of winning the league.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dix Roberts&#8217; game against Mike Nicholas on board three was agreed drawn, with the result that the match was drawn 2.5-2.5. Horsham now only have an outside chance of winning the league.</p>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/update-mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-knoll-knights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mid-Sussex League Division 1 2011-12: Horsham 1 &#8211; St Francis and Haywards Heath 1</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-st-francis-and-haywards-heath-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-st-francis-and-haywards-heath-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid-Sussex League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sicilian Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Horsham 1 were back to winning ways last Tuesday, braving the snow to visit the St Francis and Haywards Heath venue for the first time. They have a 3.5-0.5 lead with only one game outstanding, which looked to me like &#8230; <a href="http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-st-francis-and-haywards-heath-1/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horsham 1 were back to winning ways last Tuesday, braving the snow to visit the St Francis and Haywards Heath venue for the first time. They have a 3.5-0.5 lead with only one game outstanding, which looked to me like a draw.<span id="more-987"></span></p>
<p>Phil Stimpson played out a solid draw against Vivian Cole on board four in the first game to finish. Next, I was able to score a convincing win with Black against Thomas Fitzgerald on board two. Peter Harbott gained an early advantage over J.P.Rix, and although he gave him chances later on, was able to consolidate it and reach the time control, when his opponent prompty resigned. Dix Roberts looked to be in trouble against Jeffrey Boardman, but his opponent blundered a piece and Dix was able to hang on.</p>
<p>The unfinished game is the one between Gavin Lox and Feliks Kwiatkowski. With Gavin as White, it developed into a sharp Modern Benoni, where both players (as usual for them) got into big time trouble. The final position looks level, although Gavin&#8217;s pawn structure does look slightly weaker.</p>
<p>I give my game against Thomas Fitzgerald below with some notes:</p>
<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_f1ad870a' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event "Mid-Sussex League"]  [Site "Haywards Heath"]  [Date "2012.2.9"]  [Round ""]  [White "Fitzgerald, Thomas R (St Francis and Haywards Heath 1)"]  [Black "Mansson, James C (Horsham 1)"]  [Result "0-1"]  [Eco "B90"]   1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.f3 Be7 9.Qd2 O-O 10.Be2   {This move seems inconsistent with Be3, f3, Qd2. 10.O-O-O is the normal approach, with a sharp game.}   Nbd7 11.O-O   {This kind of position is unpromising for White, as he lacks a decent plan. Black in contrast has a clear way of improving his position.}   b5 12.a3 Qc7 13.Rad1 Rac8 14.Kh1 Rfd8 15.f4   {Black was going to play &#8230;Nb6 and &#8230;d5, so White felt he had to do something. However, this move weakens e4, without achieving much in return.}   Bxb3   {?! When I played this, I didn&#8217;t see that 17 Nd5 was possible. Fortunately my opponent failed to realise this as well! 15&#8230;Nb6 was more natural, and stronger, when Black has the better of it.}   16.cxb3 Nc5   {Or 16&#8230;Qb7 17.b4 exf4 18.Rxf4 Ne5 and the weaknesses on both sides balance out.}   17.Bxc5   {?! 17.Nd5! was the move I underestimated, as I cannot capture on e4 (17&#8230;Ncxe4? 18.Nxc7 Nxd2 19.Bxd2 Rxc7 20.Ba5; 17&#8230;Nfxe4? 18.Qc2). Still Black is probably still fine after 17&#8230;Qb7 18.fxe5 Nxd5 19.Qxd5 Qxd5 20.Rxd5 dxe5 21.Rxe5 Bd6 22.Ref5 Nxe4 although any advantage has now gone.}   dxc5 18.Qc2   {? 18.Nd5 Nxd5 19.exd5 exf4 20.Qxf4 Bd6 is promising for Black, but at least White is not a pawn down!}   exf4 19.Nd5   {?! This changes the pawn structure in Black&#8217;s favour.}   Nxd5 20.exd5 Qe5 21.Bf3 Bd6 22.Rfe1 Qg5 23.Qe2 g6 24.Qe4 h5   {Black has a strong grip on the position. White, who was starting to run short of time at this point, proves unable to defend against the Black build up.}   25.Qe2 Kf8 26.Qd2 Re8 27.Qc3 Kg8 28.Qa5 Qh4 29.Qc3   {?! This loses quickly, but White was already in big trouble. 29.Rf1 was a better try, but Black still wins a piece after 29&#8230;g5! 30.Qxa6 Rcd8 31.Qxb5 g4 although at least White has grabbed some pawns for it.}   Re3 30.Qd2 Rce8 31.Rf1 g5   {White resigned as he cannot prevent the crushing &#8230;g4.}   0-1   </textarea><iframe src='http://www.sports-data.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/embed-chessboard/pgn4web/board.html?am=none&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=F6F6F6&amp;dch=E0E0E0&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=80p&amp;fmch=000000&amp;fcch=808080&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=80p&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=643&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_f1ad870a' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='643' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts</iframe></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-st-francis-and-haywards-heath-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horsham Club Quickplay Knockout 2011-12: Mansson &#8211; Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/horsham-club-quickplay-knockout-2011-12-mansson-donnelly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/horsham-club-quickplay-knockout-2011-12-mansson-donnelly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gruenfeld Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sicilian Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I played Brian Donnelly in the third round of the Quickplay Knockout last Tuesday. A few years ago, when he was more active, I used to play Brian much more often, but these were the first games I had played &#8230; <a href="http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/horsham-club-quickplay-knockout-2011-12-mansson-donnelly/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played Brian Donnelly in the third round of the Quickplay Knockout last Tuesday. A few years ago, when he was more active, I used to play Brian much more often, but these were the first games I had played against him for a while.<span id="more-980"></span></p>
<p>The first game of our match (two games of 10 minutes each, then sudden death) was a typically dramatic Sicilian. Following an unusual choice of sub-variation, Brian managed to get the upper hand, but as both players ran short of time, mutual blunders ensued, before he allowed me to deliver a snap mate.</p>
<p>The second game was something of a damp squib. Following an innocuous opening, Brian blundered badly, then resigned in reply to my response.</p>
<p>I am due to play Peter Harbott in the semi-final, which should prove an exciting match.</p>
<p>I give the games below with some notes.</p>
<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_ec6d4e55' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event "Club Quickplay Knockout"]  [Site "Horsham"]  [Date "2012.2.7"]  [Round "3.1"]  [White "Donnelly, Brian P"]  [Black "Mansson, James C"]  [Result "0-1"]  [Eco "B86"]   1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bc4 e6 7.Bb3 Nbd7 8.Be3   {!? This is an unusual move in this system. More common are 8.f4, 8.O-O and 8.Bg5.}   Nc5 9.f3 Bd7   {Black wanted to play &#8230;b5 while stopping Nc6, but this has the downside of depriving both knights of the d7 square.  9&#8230;Be7 10.Qd2 Qc7 11.O-O-O b5 would seem to be a better way to achieve this.}   10.Qd2 Be7 11.O-O-O b5 12.g4   {Now g5 is a problem for Black.}   b4 13.Nce2 e5   {!? Black could see no other way to deal with g5.}   14.Nf5 Bxf5 15.gxf5 Nxb3+ 16.cxb3   {16.axb3 Qa5 17.Kb1 d5! 18.exd5 Rd8 gives Black counterplay.}   a5   {Black should strike back aggressively in the centre with 16&#8230;d5! 17.exd5 Qc7+ 18.Kb1 Rd8.}   17.Kb1 O-O   {Black had spent 6 or 7 of his 10 minutes to reach this spot, while White had only used 3 or 4.}   18.Rhg1 Kh8 19.Bg5 Ra6 20.h4   {White now started to use up more of his time, and both players were soon down to their last couple of minutes.}   Qb8   {20&#8230;d5 was worth considering.}   21.h5 a4   {? This allows White the chance to smash Black&#8217;s pawns or win a pawn. 21&#8230;Rc6 was better.}   22.bxa4 Rxa4 23.Nc1   {? which he fails to do with 23.Bxf6.}   Rc8   {? Allowing the possibility again. 23&#8230;Ra6 was better.}   24.Bxf6   {Also good was 24.h6.}   gxf6 25.Qd5 Qc7   {?? This introduces a sequence in which Black gives White the chance to capture on f7 with a decisive advantage three times, and three times White overlooks it. Note that by this point both players were very short of time. 25&#8230;Rf8 was a better move.}   26.Qb3   {? 26.Qxf7 wins.}   Ra6   {?? 26&#8230;Raa8 was better.}   27.h6   {? 27.Qxf7 wins.}   Rc6   {?? 27&#8230;d5 was better.}   28.Nd3   {? 28.Qxf7 wins.}   Bf8   {? 28&#8230;d5 was better.}   29.Nxb4 Rc4 30.Nd5 Qc5 31.Nxf6 Bxh6 32.Rh1   {? White allows Black to win on the spot. Instead 32.a3 Rc2 33.Rh1 wins.}   Rc1+   {! White resigned because of 33.Rxc1 Qxc1+ 34.Rxc1 Rxc1#}   0-1   [Event "Club Quickplay Knockout"]  [Site "Horsham"]  [Date "2012.2.7"]  [Round "3.2"]  [White "Mansson, James C"]  [Black "Donnelly, Brian P"]  [Result "1-0"]  [Eco "D85"]   1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 d5 3.cxd5  Nxd5 4.d4   {4.e4 is a more aggressive move order, which after 4&#8230;Nb6 5.d4 g6 transposes to the game.}   g6 5.e4 Nb6 6.h3 Bg7 7.Nc3 O-O 8.Be3   {8.Be2 Nc6 9.Be3 is the move order recommended by Khalifman, as White doesn&#8217;t need to play Be3 until Black plays &#8230;Nc6.}   Nc6 9.d5   {9.Be2 transposes to the previous note.}   Ne5 10.Nxe5 Bxe5 11.Be2 e6 12.Bd4 Bxd4 13.Qxd4 exd5 14.exd5 Re8 15.O-O Nxd5   {?? Black was doing fine, but here he makes a terrible blunder.}   16.Nxd5   {Black resigned as 16&#8230;Rxe2 17.Nf6+ wins the queen.}   1-0   </textarea><iframe src='http://www.sports-data.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/embed-chessboard/pgn4web/board.html?am=none&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=F6F6F6&amp;dch=E0E0E0&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=80p&amp;fmch=000000&amp;fcch=808080&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=80p&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=677&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_ec6d4e55' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='677' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts</iframe></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/horsham-club-quickplay-knockout-2011-12-mansson-donnelly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update &#8211; Mid-Sussex League Division 1 2011-12: Horsham 1 – Eastbourne 1</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/update-mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-eastbourne-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/update-mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-eastbourne-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mid-Sussex League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two unfinished games from this match were agreed drawn, so the final score was a 2.5-2.5 draw. This leaves Horsham 1 with only an outside shot at the title this year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two unfinished games from this match were agreed drawn, so the final score was a 2.5-2.5 draw. This leaves Horsham 1 with only an outside shot at the title this year.</p>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/update-mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-eastbourne-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mid-Sussex League Division 1 2011-12: Horsham 1 – Knoll Knights</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-knoll-knights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-knoll-knights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid-Sussex League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Symmetrical English]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A tight match between Horsham 1 and Knoll Knights last Tuesday still hangs in the balance, with the score at 2-2 and Dix Robert&#8217;s game against Mike Nicholas unfinished. The match started badly for Horsham, with Peter Harbott going down &#8230; <a href="http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-knoll-knights/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tight match between Horsham 1 and Knoll Knights last Tuesday still hangs in the balance, with the score at 2-2 and Dix Robert&#8217;s game against Mike Nicholas unfinished. <span id="more-970"></span></p>
<p>The match started badly for Horsham, with Peter Harbott going down in flames on bottom board. Phil Stimpson&#8217;s position gradually deteriorated, until he was finally forced to concede. Things then took a turn for the better, as Gavin Lock secured a win on board one against John Bryant, and my game concluded in my favour in dramatic circumstances, as I forced mate with 2 seconds left on my clock!</p>
<p>Dix Roberts stands better against Mike Nicholas but it is not clear whether he can demonstrate a win, so the match could well end up drawn, which would put a real dent in Horsham&#8217;s title hope this season.</p>
<p>My game is given below with notes. My opponent was comfortably ahead on the clock until move 30, but then rapidly caught me up as his position came under pressure. I thought for two long in rejecting 20&#8230;b5 and 21&#8230;d5, and rapidly became short of time after that. However, although I missed some stronger moves, I did avoid making any obvious blunders, and the pressure told as my opponent fell into a snap mate.</p>
<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_ff30978' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event "Mid-Sussex League"]  [Site "Horsham"]  [Date "2012.1.31"]  [White "Kelly, Ian G (Knoll Knights)"]  [Black "Mansson, James C (Horsham 1)"]  [Result "0-1"]  [Eco "A30"]   1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.g3 b6 4.Bg2 Bb7 5.O-O e6 6.e3 Be7 7.b3 O-O 8.Bb2  d6 9.Qe2 Nbd7 10.Rd1 Rc8 11.Nc3 Qc7 12.Rac1 Qb8 13.d4 Rfe8 14.Ne1  Bxg2 15.Nxg2 cxd4 16.Rxd4 Qb7 17.e4 a6   {The game has reached a typical Hedgehog position. The usual game of cat and  mouse ensues. But the question is, as always, who is the cat and who is the mouse?}   18.Rdd1 Bf8 19.f3 Qb8 20.Ne3 Ne5   {This aims to provoke the weakening move f4, with success! 20&#8230;b5 21.cxb5 d5 was a line Black considered during a long think, but he could not find anything after 22.bxa6.}   21.f4 Ned7 22.Nc2 b5   {! This works because e4 has been undermined.}   23.cxb5 axb5 24.Qxb5   {24.Nxb5 Nxe4!}   Qa7+   {! 24&#8230;Qxb5 25.Nxb5 Nxe4}   25.Kg2 Nc5   {! 25&#8230;Qa8 26.Qa4!}   26.e5   {26.Qe2 Qa8}   dxe5 27.fxe5 Ng4   {27&#8230;Qa8+}   28.Qe2 Qa8+ 29.Kh3   {This looks like a risky square for the king, as the game proves! 29.Kg1 is more natural.}   h5   {Black was starting to run significantly short of time, with less than a minute a move left to make the time control at move 42.}   30.Nd4 g6 31.Nf3   {? Better was 31.Ndb5 or 31.b4.}   Bh6 32.Rb1   {32.Rc2 Ne3; 32.Ra1 Red8}   Be3   {32&#8230;Ne3}   33.Rf1   {? 33.Kg2!}   Red8   {Here Black missed a chance to gain a big advantage:  33&#8230;Ne4! 34.Nd1 (34.Nxe4 Qxe4 35.Rbc1 (35.Nd2 Qc2; 35.Ng5 Qc2) Rxc1 36.Bxc1  (36.Rxc1 Nf2+ 37.Kg2 Bxc1) Rc8 wins.) Qxa2 35.Ra1 (35.Nxe3 Nc3) Qxb3 36.Nxe3 Qxe3 leaves Black well on top.}   34.Rbd1 Rxd1   {34&#8230;Ne4 was rejected by by Black because of 35.Rxd8+ Rxd8 36.Nxe4 Qxe4 37.Ng5 but then Black can play  37&#8230;Rd2! 38.Qxd2 (38.Nxe4? Rxe2 wins.) Nf2+ 39.Qxf2 Qg4+ 40.Kg2 Bxf2 41.Rxf2 Qxg5  although White has decent compensation for the queen.}   35.Nxd1 Bh6   {35&#8230;Qe4}   36.Bd4   {! This move came as a surprise to Black, and caused him to run down his clock to under ten seconds.}   Qe4   {36&#8230;Ne4}   37.Qxe4 Nxe4 38.Re1 Ng5+   {Now Black had four seconds left.}   39.Nxg5 Bxg5 40.Bb2   {40.a4; 40.Re2}   Rc2 41.Rf1   {?? A terrible blunder, but by now White didn&#8217;t have more than 10 seconds. 41.Rh1 was necessary.}   Rxh2#   {Black had two seconds left when he delivered mate!}   0-1   </textarea><iframe src='http://www.sports-data.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/embed-chessboard/pgn4web/board.html?am=none&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=F6F6F6&amp;dch=E0E0E0&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=80p&amp;fmch=000000&amp;fcch=808080&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=80p&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=643&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_ff30978' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='643' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts</iframe></div>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-knoll-knights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mid-Sussex League Division 1 2011-12: Horsham 1 – Eastbourne 1</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-eastbourne-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-eastbourne-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid-Sussex League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sicilian Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Horsham 1 was away at Eastbourne 1 in the Mid-Sussex League last Friday. The match is still in the balance, with two games requiring adjudication unless a result can be agreed. In the completed games the score is 1.5-1.5. The &#8230; <a href="http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-eastbourne-1/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horsham 1 was away at Eastbourne 1 in the Mid-Sussex League last Friday. The match is still in the balance, with two games requiring adjudication unless a result can be agreed. In the completed games the score is 1.5-1.5. The unfinished games both seem to me to most likely be draws, which means that the match would be drawn.<span id="more-964"></span></p>
<p>The first game to finish was Peter Harbott&#8217;s game against Paul Carpenter. As I can vouch from playing him myself a few years ago, Paul is a dangerous player, and Peter suffered the consequences of underestimating his attack.</p>
<p>Both Gavin Lock&#8217;s game and my game were decided in time scrambles, although in quite different ways. Gavin managed to finally overcome Peter Fleming as the latter hallucinated and played an unsound knight sacrifice. He resigned promptly after Gavin&#8217;s reply.</p>
<p>In my game against Adrian Pickersgill, I managed to get much the better of the position, and was pressing for a win. However, I was down to about three minutes for fourteen moves, in a position that didn&#8217;t seem entirely clear. My opponent played his 29th move and offered a draw. Unable to see anything clear, I accepted the offer. He then pointed out that after playing the move, he realised that it was a blunder. Unfortunately for me, I had not seen the correct reply!</p>
<p>In the unfinished games, Dix Roberts is worse against Oliver Froom, while Anthony Higgs is better against Mike Roberts. However, in both cases the side with the advantage does not seem to have anything clear.</p>
<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_954be067' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event "Mid-Sussex League"]  [Site "Eastbourne"]  [Date "2012.1.21"]  [White "Pickersgill, Adrian O (Eastbourne 1)"]  [Black "Mansson, James C (Horsham 1)"]  [Result "1/2-1/2"]  [Eco "B22"]   1.e4 c5 2.c3 Nf6 3.e5 Nd5 4.d4 cxd4 5.Qxd4 e6 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Qe4 f5 8.Qe2   {8.exf6 Nxf6 gives Black a strong centre.}   b5   {! Black offers a strong pawn sacrifice to speed up his play on the queenside.}   9.g3   {9.Qxb5 Qc7 10.Qe2 a5 followed by &#8230;Ba6 gives Black obvious compensation for the pawn.}   a5 10.Bg2 Be7 11.O-O O-O 12.Rd1 Ba6 13.b3   {?! This just weakens the White queenside. It was better to move one of the knights by 13.Nbd2 or 13.Nd4.}   a4   {!? This makes it hard for White to develop the queenside with Bb2 and Nbd2. On the other hand, Black&#8217;s queenside pawn can become vulnerable too. 13&#8230;Qc7 was more flexible and possibly better.}   14.Qe1 Qc7 15.b4   {White doesn&#8217;t really want to make this weakening move, but otherwise, how can he develop? Also, there is the compensation that he will be able to get some play against b5.}   Rac8 16.Bd2 Rfe8   {This mysterious rook move aims to open up the centre with &#8230;d6.}   17.Na3 d6 18.Bf1   {? 18.exd6 Bxd6 19.Rac1 (intending c4) Qb8 20.Qe2 followed by Bf1 gives some counter-play against b5.}   dxe5 {!} 19.Bxb5   { (a) 19.Nxb5 Qb6 is better for Black; (b) 19.Rac1 Qb8 20.Nxb5 Bxb5 21.Bxb5 (21.c4 Ncxb4) Qxb5 22.c4 Qb7 is better for Black; (c) 19.c4? bxc4 20.b5? Bxa3 21.bxc6 e4 or 21.bxa6 e4 is just losing for White.}   Bxb5 20.Nxb5 Qb8   {20&#8230;Qb6 may be better as after 21.Qe2 e4 22.Nfd4 the move 22&#8230;Ne5 is possible because e6 is covered by the queen.}   21.Na3   {? 21.Qe2 e4 22.Nfd4 is more active, when 22&#8230;Ne5 can be met by 23.Nxe6.}   e4 22.Nd4   {? 22.Rac1 was better as the knight on f3 doesn&#8217;t have to move yet.}   Nxd4   {22&#8230;Ne5 was also possible, but why not create a weak pawn on d4?}   23.cxd4 Qb6   {This is good, but capturing on b4 with the knight is probably best: 23&#8230;Nxb4! 24.Rab1 Nd3 25.Qf1 Qa8. The bishop capture is also good, but gives White more play, e.g. 23&#8230;Bxb4 24.Rab1 Bxd2 25.Qxd2 Qd6 26.Nb5 Qd7.}   24.Rac1 Qxd4 25.Rxc8   {? 25.Nc4 {is a better try for counter-play, based on the line 25&#8230;Rxc4 26.Be3}   Rxc8 26.Nb5 Qb2   {26&#8230;Qd3! is even stronger.}   27.a3 Rc2 28.Bc1 Qe5 29.f4   {? White offered a draw, which Black accepted as he was very short of time, having about three minutes to make fourteen moves. However, the move he played is a serious blunder, although Black did not spot the problem with it. The point is that 29&#8230;Nxf4! 30.Bxf4 Qxb5 is very good for Black, although the position is still tricky when very short of time.}   1/2-1/2   </textarea><iframe src='http://www.sports-data.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/embed-chessboard/pgn4web/board.html?am=none&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=F6F6F6&amp;dch=E0E0E0&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=80p&amp;fmch=000000&amp;fcch=808080&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=80p&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=643&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_954be067' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='643' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts</iframe></div>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mid-sussex-league-division-1-2011-12-horsham-1-eastbourne-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McArthur Cup 2011-12: Horsham – Brighton</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mcarthur-cup-2011-12-horsham-brighton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mcarthur-cup-2011-12-horsham-brighton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Mansson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid-Sussex League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Symmetrical English]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-data.co.uk/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Tuesday saw Horsham&#8217;s first match in the McArthur Cup for many years. We had something of a (re-)baptism of fire, being paired against Brighton, one of the strongest sides in Sussex. Unlike the Mid-Sussex League matches, there is a &#8230; <a href="http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mcarthur-cup-2011-12-horsham-brighton/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Tuesday saw Horsham&#8217;s first match in the McArthur Cup for many years. We had something of a (re-)baptism of fire, being paired against Brighton, one of the strongest sides in Sussex. Unlike the Mid-Sussex League matches, there is a compulsory quick-play finish in all games, with each player having 75 minutes to play 35 moves, followed by 30 minutes for the remaining moves.<span id="more-956"></span></p>
<p>The match started with Horsham coming under pressure on boards 4 and 6. Peter Harbott on bottom board was fortunate that his opponent first overlooked a simple means of winning a pawn early on, then agreed a draw in what looked like much the superior position. Dix Roberts was struggling on board 4 against John Henshaw, but his opponent too offered a draw when he was on top. Combined with a solid draw by Mike Forster on board 2 against Brian Denman, this left Horsham with a solid position in the match.</p>
<p>In the meanwhile, Gavin Lock was gradually building a powerful attack on top board against Luke Rutherford, while I had plenty of pressure on Geoff James&#8217; position on board 3. However, Phil Stimpson emerged from the opening a pawn down and was definitely struggling against Paul Batchelor.</p>
<p>I allowed my advantage to slip, and then decided on a dangerous piece sacrifice for two pawns, leading to a very double-edged endgame. The match was now very much in the balance. Should Gavin prevail on board 1, and I gain at least a draw, then the result of Phil&#8217;s game would become irrelevant, as even if he lost, as was looking increasingly likely, we would win on board count.</p>
<p>Then things swung against Horsham as Gavin was unable to push home his attack, and was forced to take a draw by perpetual check. Phil was now definitely losing and indeed soon conceded. It was all down to my game.</p>
<p>I managed to win the piece back for my two pawns, and ended up with a superior bishop vs. knight endgame. However, I was unable to squeeze a decisive error out of my opponent, and forced a draw with second to spare. This left Brighton with a narrow 3.5-2.5 win, and Horsham fell at the first hurdle.</p>
<p>I give my game below with some notes.</p>
<div class='chessboard-wrapper'><textarea id='pgn4web_92dfff65' style='display:none;' cols='40' rows='8'>   [Event "McArthur Cup"]  [Site "Horsham"]  [Date "2012.1.17"]  [Round "1"]  [White "Mansson, James C (Horsham)"]  [Black "James, Geoffrey H (Brighton)"]  [Result "1/2-1/2"]  [Eco "A15"]   1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 b6 3.g3 Bb7 4.Bg2 e6 5.O-O Be7 6.Nc3 O-O 7.Re1 c5 8.e4 d6 9.d4 cxd4 10.Nxd4 Qd7   {?! This is a dubious square for the queen. 10&#8230;Qc8 was better.}   11.f4 Rd8 12.Be3 Na6 13.Rc1   {13.f5 Rac8 14.fxe6 fxe6 15.Bh3 as played in Spielmann &#8211; Mikulskas, Vandoeuvre 2008, looks strong.}   Nc5 14.Bf2 d5   {?! This break should not work.}   15.exd5 exd5 16.Nxd5 Nxd5 17.cxd5 Bf8 18.b4   {18.Nc6 was also strong, although White rejected it because after Bxc6 19.dxc6 Qc7 he missed 20.Bd5 as mentioned by Black after the game.}   Na6 19.a3   {?! 19.b5! Nc5 20.Nc6 was stronger, with a big advantage.}   Bxd5 20.Nc6 Bxg2 21.Qxd7   {?! (a) 21.Kxg2! Qb7 seemed awkward, but after 22.Qf3 White is doing reasonably well; (b) 21.Nxd8? Bd5 22.Nxf7 Qxf7 is not to be recommended.}   Rxd7 22.Kxg2 Rd3 23.Ne7+   {!? 23.Re3 was safer, with a slight advantage.}   Kh8   {23&#8230;Bxe7 24.Rxe7 Rxa3? 25.Rxa7!! wins.}   24.Rc8   {White&#8217;s knight now gets stuck on c8. 24.Nc8 g6 25.Re8 Kg7 26.Rc6 keeps some pressure.}   Rxc8 25.Nxc8 Rd7 26.Re8 Kg8   {Black intends &#8230;Nc7, winning material.}   27.Nxa7   {!? A bold idea, but risky: the connected passed pawns will be dangerous, but they are still a long way from the queening squares. Instead 27.Re1 Rc7 28.Re8 repeats.}   Rxa7 28.Bxb6 Rb7 29.Be3 Re7 30.Rxe7 Bxe7 31.f5   {! A very good move: it is important that White arranges his kingside pawns on the light squares to make them safe from the Black bishop.}   Kf8 32.Kf3 Nc7 33.Ke4 Ke8 34.Bd4 f6 35.Kd3 Nb5   {Time control}   36.Bb2 Kd7 37.g4 Kc6 38.a4 Nc7   {38&#8230;Nd6 may be better, covering c4 and e4, and therefore making it hard for White to advance his king.}   39.Kc4 Bd6 40.h3 Bf4 41.Bd4 Bg3 42.b5+ Kd7 43.a5 Be1 44.a6   {White has to decide whether to allow Black to give up a piece for the passed pawns. 44.b6 Bxa5 (44&#8230;Na6? 45.Kb5 Nb8 46.a6 wins.) 45.b7 Na6 46.Kb5 Nb8 47.Kxa5 is the best move order if White wants to win the piece back. The game move order is flawed, if this is White&#8217;s intention.}   Ba5 45.b6   {? White overlooked that Black could take on a6. 45.g5 fxg5 46.Bxg7 Bb6 47.Be5 is a better idea, creating passed pawns on both wings. The position is probably equal.}   Bxb6   {? Missing a chance. 45&#8230;Nxa6! 46.Kb5 (46.g5! is a better try, though Black is now for choice.) Nb8! 47.Kxa5?? Nc6+ wins.}   46.Bxb6 Nxa6 47.Kb5 Nb8 48.Bc5 Ke8 49.Bd6 Nd7 50.Kc6 g6   {?! 50&#8230;Nf8 is safer.}   51.fxg6   {?! This leads to a draw. 51.h4! looks like a better try. Black will have to work harder to hold.}   hxg6 52.h4 Nf8 53.Kd5 Kf7 54.Bxf8 Kxf8 55.Ke6 Kg7 56.h5 gxh5 57.gxh5   {White offered a draw}   1/2-1/2   </textarea><iframe src='http://www.sports-data.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/embed-chessboard/pgn4web/board.html?am=none&amp;d=3000&amp;ig=f&amp;ih=s&amp;ss=26&amp;ps=d&amp;pf=d&amp;lch=F6F6F6&amp;dch=E0E0E0&amp;bbch=E0E0E0&amp;hm=b&amp;hch=ABABAB&amp;bd=c&amp;cbch=F0F0F0&amp;ctch=696969&amp;hd=j&amp;md=f&amp;tm=13&amp;fhch=000000&amp;fhs=80p&amp;fmch=000000&amp;fcch=808080&amp;hmch=E0E0E0&amp;fms=80p&amp;fcs=m&amp;cd=i&amp;bch=FFFFFF&amp;fp=13&amp;hl=f&amp;fh=643&amp;fw=p&amp;pi=pgn4web_92dfff65' frameborder='0' width='100%' height='643' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'>your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard; alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts</iframe></div>
<div class="post-scriptum"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-data.co.uk/posts/mcarthur-cup-2011-12-horsham-brighton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

